Rights given should never be
taken as a given.
Just because the law protects
us doesn’t mean those protections will always be respected. Not even by
allegedly respectable entities such as school districts.
Take Anthony Merchante, for
example. Anthony is a cute little 7-year old boy. He has more challenges to
deal with, though, then the average 7 year old. He has cerebral palsy, spastic
paralysis and a seizure disorder. He cannot speak, and he uses a wheelchair for
mobility.
Because Anthony is a person
with a disability, he has rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. One
of those rights is the use of a service dog. And it just so happens that a
bright, dedicated, professionally trained dog came into his life. The Staffordshire
terrier, named Stevie, alerts caregivers when Anthony needs help.
Stevie knows when Anthony
needs help stabilizing his head to keep his airway open. The dog steps onto
Anthony’s wheelchair and lays across his lap. The dog alerts humans by stepping
on a mat with a sensor should Anthony have a medical emergency, such as a
seizure. Stevie’s vest carries medical supplies and emergency instructions for Anthony’s
human caregivers.
Not only is Stevie an
essential part of Anthony’s daily care, but he’s a gentleman, too. He stays at
Anthony’s side, is never disruptive, doesn’t beg for food or bother anyone.
Nevertheless, Broward County,
FL school administrators decided, for whatever reason, they did not like
Stevie. Didn’t want him in Anthony’s school, even though the dog has never misbehaved.
Anthony’s mother tried for two
years to convince the school district that Stevie is an essential part of
Anthony’s life. She tried to make them see that, without the service dog, her
son could not get the education he is entitled to.
The school district put up
roadblocks. Administrators insisted that Stevie receive vaccinations not required
of other dogs. They required Anthony’s mom to purchase expensive liability
insurance and insisted she pay a handler to accompany the dog during the school
day. The district even contended that Anthony didn’t need Stevie. That school
staff could do all the things Stevie does.
So Anthony’s mom took the
school district to court. In fact, a friend and colleague of mine – Matthew Dietz,
represented her and her son. Dietz told the court that the district’s
burdensome requirements amounted to “an impossible barrier,” and violated the
ADA.
Ultimately, the judge agreed,
ruling that is was reasonable for Stevie to accompany Anthony during the school
day, “in the same way a school would assist a non-disabled child to use the
restroom, or assist a diabetic child with her insulin pump, or assist a
physically disabled child employ her motorized wheelchair.”
The school district can no
longer separate Anthony from his service dog, and cannot impose the insurance and
handler requirements on him.
Now a seven-year old boy –
like the other seven year olds -- can focus on math and spelling and social
studies. He doesn’t have to worry that the service dog who enables him to do
these things will be taken away. That the rights he is guaranteed under federal
civil rights law will be violated by a school district that refuses to
acknowledge these rights.
It’s been a quarter century
since the passage of the ADA. But we must never let our guard down.
Like the way Stevie watches
over his friend, Anthony.
No comments:
Post a Comment